Disabled or Specially Abled: Should this be even a conundrum?

By Swagatam Roy

Human civilisation is often characterised by its tendency to question. Perceived limitations have always been its centre of attention. “A glass half-empty” has always sounded more appropriate to this social animal. However, what calls for a sharp shift in this human tendency is the convention of calling those who operate differently, as disabled. In a world that often emphasises perceived limitations, it’s crucial to shift our perspective and recognise the extraordinary strengths of specially-abled individuals.

Specially abled individuals exhibit exemplary resilience. They demonstrate unparalleled strength in overcoming challenges that many cannot fathom. Their daily lives require navigating a world not always designed with inclusivity in mind. This resilience fosters an unyielding spirit, proving that true strength lies not in the absence of challenges but in the ability to conquer them. These specially-abled individuals showcase exceptional adaptability. Their lives demand constant adjustments, fostering a mindset that embraces change and innovation. This adaptability extends beyond personal lives to professional environments, where their diverse perspectives contribute to creative problem-solving and innovation.

Whether it’s Stephen Hawking’s scientific brilliance or Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s exceptional diplomacy; whether it’s John Hockenberry’s literary expertise or Stevie Wonder’s pleasing melody, these few examples of legendary tales have competed with the acers of the world, who are “normally” abled, but have embossed their mark above all in the society. These lores of legends should be the testament that shall act as the biggest advocacy of why this conundrum between the two terminologies, ‘specially abled’ and ‘disabled’ must be demolished. Disabled? No, they are special.