
When you walk into a well-designed building, what stands out first, the way it looks or the way it works?
This question sits at the centre of architecture’s most enduring debate: form versus function. While it may sound theoretical, for architects, it shapes every decision they make.
For Sudhanshu Mishra, an alumnus of Apeejay Institute of Technology – School of Architecture & Planning (2011), this question once marked a turning point. As a student, he recalls being unable to answer what the relationship between form and function really was, a moment that pushed him to explore architecture more seriously and shaped his approach to design.
Function Comes First
At its core, architecture is about usability. A space must serve the people who use it, comfortably and intuitively.
Explaining this, Mishra points to how even the smallest spaces demand thoughtful planning, “Even if we design a toilet, whoever goes inside should get everything in an arranged manner so that there is no problem. Whatever they want on their left hand, they should get it on the left, and whatever they want on the right, they should get it on the right.”
It’s a simple example, but it captures a larger truth, good design often feels invisible because it works so naturally.
The same thinking applies to larger spaces. Designing for children, for instance, requires rethinking scale and accessibility. A railing that works for an adult may not work for a nursery student. Function, therefore, begins with understanding the user.
Form Creates Identity
But architecture doesn’t stop at functionality.
The visual character of a building, its form, is what makes it memorable. It reflects the architect’s style and creates a lasting impression.
In other words, while a building must work well for its users, it should also carry a distinct design identity.
Balancing form and function is where things get complicated.
Every client comes with unique expectations, and translating those into a design that is both practical and visually strong is not always straightforward. It requires careful planning, constant dialogue, and a deep understanding of both design principles and user needs.
